Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: Evaluation of anterior capsular contraction syndrome after cataract surgery with commonly used intraocular lenses

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172251

Figure Lengend Snippet: Eyes with ACCS risk factors

Article Snippet: – For example, it is well established that silicone IOLs lead to a greater degree of capsule contraction than acrylic IOLs., Additionally, a number of risk factors have been identified that are associated with an increased risk of ACCS, including pseudoexfoliation (PXE) syndrome, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, history of retinal surgery, and diabetes., We compared the incidence of ACCS between two most commonly used hydrophobic acrylic lenses, the AcrySof SN60WF (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) and the Tecnis ZCB00 (Abbott Medical Optics Inc, Santa Ana, CA, USA).

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: Evaluation of anterior capsular contraction syndrome after cataract surgery with commonly used intraocular lenses

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172251

Figure Lengend Snippet: Patient demographics and ACCS incidence

Article Snippet: – For example, it is well established that silicone IOLs lead to a greater degree of capsule contraction than acrylic IOLs., Additionally, a number of risk factors have been identified that are associated with an increased risk of ACCS, including pseudoexfoliation (PXE) syndrome, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, history of retinal surgery, and diabetes., We compared the incidence of ACCS between two most commonly used hydrophobic acrylic lenses, the AcrySof SN60WF (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) and the Tecnis ZCB00 (Abbott Medical Optics Inc, Santa Ana, CA, USA).

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: Evaluation of anterior capsular contraction syndrome after cataract surgery with commonly used intraocular lenses

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172251

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lens specifications

Article Snippet: – For example, it is well established that silicone IOLs lead to a greater degree of capsule contraction than acrylic IOLs., Additionally, a number of risk factors have been identified that are associated with an increased risk of ACCS, including pseudoexfoliation (PXE) syndrome, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, history of retinal surgery, and diabetes., We compared the incidence of ACCS between two most commonly used hydrophobic acrylic lenses, the AcrySof SN60WF (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) and the Tecnis ZCB00 (Abbott Medical Optics Inc, Santa Ana, CA, USA).

Techniques: Modification

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: The influence of low signal-to-noise ratio of axial length measurement on prediction of target refraction, achieved using IOLMaster

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217584

Figure Lengend Snippet: The comparison of mean numeric errors between 3 kinds IOLs.

Article Snippet: Notably, a previous study reported that there was no significant difference in postoperative refraction according to types of aspheric and acrylic IOLs manufactured by Abbott Medical Optics Inc. and Alcon Inc.[ ] In addition, we compared three types of IOLs (Tecnis ZCB00, EnVista MX60, and AcrySof IQ SN60WF) to reduce the errors due to variety of IOLs.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Ophthalmology

Article Title: Influence of implantation of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry

doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02372-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Demographic data and postoperative visual acuity in eyes with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses

Article Snippet: Patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of a diffractive trifocal IOL or monofocal IOL (TFNT00 and SN60WF, respectively; Alcon Laboratories) from July 2019 to August 2020 were recruited.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Ophthalmology

Article Title: Influence of implantation of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry

doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02372-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Box plots of mean deviation (left) and foveal sensitivity (right) for 10–2 grid standard automated perimetry in eyes with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the current study. The mean deviation and foveal sensitivity with monofocal IOLs are significantly higher than those with trifocal IOLs ( P < 0.021)

Article Snippet: Patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of a diffractive trifocal IOL or monofocal IOL (TFNT00 and SN60WF, respectively; Alcon Laboratories) from July 2019 to August 2020 were recruited.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Ophthalmology

Article Title: Influence of implantation of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry

doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02372-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Box plot of mean deviation for 10–2 grid standard automated perimetry in eyes with monofocal, diffractive trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) obtained in previous and current studies. The mean deviation values associated with the use of the trifocal IOLs are lower than those for the use of the monofocal IOLs ( P = 0.027, t-test with Holm’s multiple comparisons), not different from those for the use of EDOF IOLs, and higher than those for the use of bifocal IOLs ( P = 0.035)

Article Snippet: Patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of a diffractive trifocal IOL or monofocal IOL (TFNT00 and SN60WF, respectively; Alcon Laboratories) from July 2019 to August 2020 were recruited.

Techniques:

Journal: Materials

Article Title: Measurement of Force Required for Anterior Displacement of Intraocular Lenses and Its Defining Parameters

doi: 10.3390/ma13204593

Figure Lengend Snippet: The six Intraocular lens (IOL) models used in this experiment. All are one-piece, soft-acrylic, +20-D refractive force, 6-mm optics diameter. ( a ) HOYA XY-1, ( b ) HOYA 255, ( c ) J&J ZCB00V, ( d ) Alcon SN60WF, ( e ) KOWA YP2.2, and ( f ) Nidek NS60YG.

Article Snippet: In this study, 18 IOLs representing six IOL models ( n = 3 of each model; HOYA 255, HOYA XY1, J&J ZCB00V, Alcon SN60WF, KOWA YP2.2, and Nidek NS60YG) were used ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Materials

Article Title: Measurement of Force Required for Anterior Displacement of Intraocular Lenses and Its Defining Parameters

doi: 10.3390/ma13204593

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of IOL models.

Article Snippet: In this study, 18 IOLs representing six IOL models ( n = 3 of each model; HOYA 255, HOYA XY1, J&J ZCB00V, Alcon SN60WF, KOWA YP2.2, and Nidek NS60YG) were used ( , ).

Techniques: Refractive Index

Journal: Materials

Article Title: Measurement of Force Required for Anterior Displacement of Intraocular Lenses and Its Defining Parameters

doi: 10.3390/ma13204593

Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental settings. ( a ) Setting for the IOL displacement force measurement. The forces required for anterior displacement of the IOLs. The IOLs set in the fixture are displaced anteriorly (anterior chamber side) by a pusher from the posterior (vitreous cavity) side until the IOL optics move 1 mm in the water. The water temperature is set at 35 °C. ( b ) The setting for the IOL hardness measurement. The IOL is indented by the indenter perpendicular to the center of the optics. ( c , d ) The settings for the string lengths ( c , pink double arrow) and thickness ( d , pink double arrow) measurements of the haptics/optics junction area. ( e , f ) The settings for the posterior IOL bulge measurement. The IOLs are set in a clear cylinder with an inner diameter of 10 mm ( e ), and the distance between the rubber disc surface and surface of the IOL (red double arrow) is measured.

Article Snippet: In this study, 18 IOLs representing six IOL models ( n = 3 of each model; HOYA 255, HOYA XY1, J&J ZCB00V, Alcon SN60WF, KOWA YP2.2, and Nidek NS60YG) were used ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Materials

Article Title: Measurement of Force Required for Anterior Displacement of Intraocular Lenses and Its Defining Parameters

doi: 10.3390/ma13204593

Figure Lengend Snippet: Forces required for anterior displacement of each IOL model (mN).

Article Snippet: In this study, 18 IOLs representing six IOL models ( n = 3 of each model; HOYA 255, HOYA XY1, J&J ZCB00V, Alcon SN60WF, KOWA YP2.2, and Nidek NS60YG) were used ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Materials

Article Title: Measurement of Force Required for Anterior Displacement of Intraocular Lenses and Its Defining Parameters

doi: 10.3390/ma13204593

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference in forces required for anterior IOL displacement among the various IOL models.

Article Snippet: In this study, 18 IOLs representing six IOL models ( n = 3 of each model; HOYA 255, HOYA XY1, J&J ZCB00V, Alcon SN60WF, KOWA YP2.2, and Nidek NS60YG) were used ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Materials

Article Title: Measurement of Force Required for Anterior Displacement of Intraocular Lenses and Its Defining Parameters

doi: 10.3390/ma13204593

Figure Lengend Snippet: IOL hardness, haptics junction area, and posterior IOL bulge in each IOL model.

Article Snippet: In this study, 18 IOLs representing six IOL models ( n = 3 of each model; HOYA 255, HOYA XY1, J&J ZCB00V, Alcon SN60WF, KOWA YP2.2, and Nidek NS60YG) were used ( , ).

Techniques: